Making a gift to a minor may be difficult for a number of reasons. The minor may not be legally able to manage the property that you leave for them. In addition, they may not be responsible enough to manage the asset for their long term benefit.

For some, making gifts to their minor children may be a technique to reduce the size of their estate for estate tax purposes. Whatever the reason may be, there are a couple of options for making a gift to a minor that may be suitable depending on your specific situation.

Trusts

Some people decide to use a trust as the primary vehicle for holding and managing property for a minor. The trust has the benefit of having a Trustee who can manage the trust asset and who may be granted the discretion to make distributions to or for the benefit of a minor child. This trust could be established for your child either while you're alive, or it can be set up at the time of your death.

One downside to using a trust, however, is that the cost of maintaining a separate trust for a minor child may be excessive in relation to the value of the assets held in the trust. 

California Uniform Transfers to Minors Act

Where the gift to minor person is relatively small, using a custodial account under the California Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (CUTMA) may be more attractive. Generally, the gift is held by the Custodian you select until the minor child reaches a specified age.

Figuring out the best way to transfer your assets to minor beneficiaries can be challenging. Most people grapple with the desire to provide for the child but not grant unfettered access in a way that would cause the minor to lose motivation in pursuing his or her own life goals. Estate planning lawyers can provide helpful insights on how to structure such a gift.

There are countless reasons, legal or otherwise, for why a person may not be able to transfer his or her assets. Here are a few that estate planning lawyers run into from time to time:

Spendthrift Provisions - If you're the beneficiary of a trust that was established for you by someone else, chances are there is a "spendthrift" provision or clause in the trust. These types of clauses prevent the beneficiary of a trust from giving away their interest in the trust. These are often included to give beneficiaries protection against creditors.

Pension and Retirement Plans - Except for the ability to name a beneficiary, generally, it's not possible to transfer ownership of a pension plan. Similar problems exist with IRAs or other retirement accounts, unless the owner of the account is willing to withdraw the amounts from the IRA thereby causing recognition of taxable income.

Roth IRAs don't result in taxable income upon withdrawal, but the account owner would give up the ability to have the account grow tax free. There's one exception for spouses of the retirement account owner. In the case of spouses, when one dies, the surviving spouse may be able to "rollover" the account into his or her own IRA and continue the tax-deferred growth of the account.

Non-Public Businesses - If you're a partner or shareholder in a business, the governing documents or shareholder agreements may include a provision that limits your ability to transfer shares. Alternatively, securities laws may hinder the ability to transfer ownership in the business to others.

There are other scenarios where transfers of assets may not be possible, for example, a membership in a country club, businesses that are involved in controlled substances such as alcohol, and certain professional practices.

It's therefore important to consider the types of assets that you own when discussing your estate planning options.

Estate planning tends to be heavily focused on the care of loved ones. One difficulty you or someone you know may face is figuring out how to leave behind assets to care for someone who is mentally impaired or disabled to a degree that he or she cannot function independently. Some of the same considerations involved in leaving assets to a minor child are also relevant here.

Trusts

Any gifts that you make or assets you leave behind for an incapacitated person who cannot manage his or her affairs, would ideally be in the form of a trust. The Trustee of the trust can then manage those assets in a way that will be effective for the beneficiary. The Trustee can also make distributions for the benefit of the beneficiary in a way that will enhance the beneficiary's lifestyle. Frankly, the beneficiary may not even understand or be capable of comprehending the existence or nature of the trust.

Special Needs Trust

One concern that crops up for certain disabled beneficiaries is the potential loss of public benefits they may be receiving. If the beneficiary is receiving public benefits or government assistance, it's possible that your gift to them in the form of a trust or otherwise may jeopardize the beneficiary's eligibility for the public benefits and government assistance. In this scenario, it may be prudent to establish a "special needs trust" that limits how the trust assets are used so as not to cause the beneficiary to forfeit his public benefits.

Deciding the best way to leave assets to an incapacitated person can be difficult. It may depend on their level of disability, the value of the assets that you wish to give to them, or whether or not they are receiving government assistance. Having an estate planning lawyer explain the possible consequences and pros/cons of the different approaches could help you ensure that you are doing what is in the best interest of the beneficiary.

Occasionally, you may want to "opt-out" of the default estate planning rules provided by the California Probate Code (a body of law that governs many estate planning transactions and events). The default rules within the Probate Code  can provide bright-line guidance in situations where your estate planning documents may be silent as to what needs to be done. This can be extremely helpful in some situations and very frustrating in others. Here are some issues that come up from time to time.

Co-Trustees and Decision-making

Under California Probate Code Section 15620, "unless otherwise provided in the trust instrument, a power vested in two or more trustees may only be exercised by their unanimous action." This means that if you decided that you wanted 3 co-trustees of your trust and your trust doesn't state otherwise, then all 3 co-trustees would have to unanimously agree with the decision. This may be desired where you want complete harmony among the co-trustees, but it may not be desirable if you think there may be a conflict that will unnecessarily delay the administration or distribution of your trust assets.

Power of An Agent Under a Power of Attorney

A Power of Attorney can grant another person significant power over your assets; however, there are some areas where this power may be limited.

If you want your agent to be able to create, modify, revoke or terminate your trust, then the trust must specify that your agent under a Durable Power of ttorney may do so. California Probate Code Section 4264 describes other powers that your agent may exercise, but only if the Power of Attorney document expressly mentions them.

It's common for laws to provide a default framework. In some cases they are an accurate reflection of what most people want, but in others, you may need to strongly consider whether to deviate from them.